Wednesday, March 21, 2007

'Idol' less about singing, more about sideshow

After experiencing five seasons of “American Idol,” singing tends to take a back seat to the cultural spectacle of this most ubiquitous of ubiquitous television shows.

What will I remember about Tuesday night’s episode? It won’t be Lakisha Jones’ impeccable vocal control. It won’t be Melinda Doolittle’s understated but powerful vocal style.

But I will remember the preteen girl in the audience who cried for the two-hour duration of the show. (I’m betting she cried during Sanjaya Malakar’s performance because she liked it, but one can never be sure.)

And I’ll remember how Blake Lewis’ “beatboxing” screwed up the perfectly respectable 1960s hit “Time of the Season.” Oh, and let’s not forget the premiere of Haley Scarnato’s legs thanks to her brown short-shorts.

After all, we’re talking about the season that gave us Antonella Barba, the arrogantly bad singer from New Jersey best known for her revealing “personal” photos on the Internet. And we’re only just boiling it down to the top 10.

It’s getting harder and harder for an “Idol” purist like me to fully embrace the show, but I have to admit, it’s hard to look away. I have favorites just like everyone else, but I actually listen to the performances and vote based on vocal ability. If someone has a bad night, I won’t vote for him or her. I tend not to factor in previous performances and cutesy gimmicks. (“Beatboxing” and “impersonating Justin Timberlake” are both in that category). I guess I’m the Simon Cowell of phone voting.

I performed in choirs, had voice lessons and actually got up and sang solo in front of packed gymnasiums in my lifetime, so I tend to think I can make informed opinions about the quality of “American Idol” vocals. Just the fact that oh-so-cool rocker chick Gina Glocksen is still in the competition tells me that America doesn’t share my view.

Over and over, Cowell has reminded us that this is a “singing competition.” In fact, I’ve heard those two words probably more this season than in any other. It’s a shame that we need to be reminded.

And it’s also interesting that the further the show drifts away from its stated purpose, the more respected it’s becoming. The short,informative documentary about the British musical invasion of the 1960s, the night’s theme, actually made me think “Idol” is a cultured, non-corny program. Really, those vignettes just show off host Ryan Seacrest’s narrating prowess.

But credibility doesn’t seem to be an issue for “Idol,” which consistently draws in top ratings each week. Yet there are a few other reasons people might just keep believing.

Two of them are Doolittle and Jones. While they don’t have the judges’ standard “uniqueness,” they do have judge Randy Jackson’s “Yo Factor.” These two are straight up talented singers. They don’t miss notes. They’re never “pitchy.” They just make it look all too easy. Jordin Sparks is up there, too.

The only guy I’m even remotely impressed with is Chris Sligh (the Jack Osbourne look-alike). He takes real risks with his song choices, and he’s got a voice that sounds unlike almost anything I’ve heard on the show before. Phil Stacey is in a distant second.

And even if you can’t find a thing to like in this year’s crop of “Idol” hopefuls, at least tune in to see what gay joke Cowell will hurl at Seacrest each night. And, don’t forget, you’ll definitely want to see what Malakar’s done to his hair.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

I quit watching American Idol after Simon told someone that they were not "pop star material." I mean WTF?!? This woman had a voice that made that made the hair on the back of my neck stand up and yet she was not put through to the second round due to the fact that she was a bit on the round side. That's when I knew that they were not looking for a great voice, but a sexy wannabe. It still boggles my mind that people are still watching this crap because it's not America's Idol; it's the entertainment world's idol. I think that they should just take an axorexic model from off of the runway, throw her on the stage, and set her up with some lipsyncing action. It's bound to provide more entertainment than what this show does.

Anonymous said...

I liked Blake Lewis’ "Beatboxing" on "Time of the Season". It was “Cool” and well executed. I’m not so sure this is a singing competition either; it seems to me that it’s also equal parts popularity contest and showmanship. I tend to close my eyes and listen to the performance, then judge by what I’ve heard, but I’m no doubt the exception.

Rock on Renee


Keith in Hammond

The Daily Star said...

Hey Rachel,

I agree with you about the image problem on "American Idol," but the show has been putting through lots of body types lately. This season is a good example... it's just a shame they didn't put through too many good SINGERS!

Anonymous said...

I don't think it is about singing anymore b/c if it was Sanjaya would have not made it this far (WHAT IS HE DOING?)

Alissa said...

Sanjaya is still on AI most likely due to this:

www.votefortheworst.com

Interesting read.

The Daily Star said...

Yeah, I have seen VFTW (in acronym-speak)

And apparently all the VFTW voters are using this - www.dialidol.com

(I go there to see if their predictions are right.)

Anonymous said...

Very interesting observations. I myself am a Claymate!

Alissa said...

A Claymate - HEE! That was a tough choice that year, between he and Studdard.

What's odd to me about Sanjaya, is that I truly don't think he's that bad to be the absolute worst of the competition up to date, as noted with VFTW. I saw him in the audition, when he sang the "Signed, sealed, delivered" Stevie Wonder song. He was really good, and he stood out. I thought he deserved to move on in the competition. But when it comes down to it, he simply just "has his moments", and is inconsistent with his vocals. Not nailing it every time like Doolittle does.

Unless VFTW gets their way, Sanjaya's days on AI are numbered. But none of that matters really. He's made his face (hair and hula dancing) known, and he will be on the AI tour. So already he's a peice of pop culture phenomenon no matter how good or bad he sings.

But then again (insert cockney english accent here)This IS a singing competition.

Anonymous said...

The vote for the worst site is ruining AI. Having said that..I really don't agree with the image thing. There has been a lot of...let's shall we say...not beautiful people that have gone a long way. I don't think it's the judges fault either. The preteens and young teens are voting for Sanjaya because they think he's cute, not because he can sing. Also, I really think a person should be able to vote only one time for their favorite contestant. That would stop all that nonsense and maybe get back to what it's supposed to be and that is a "singing competition!"

Anonymous said...

regarding....Sanjaya "preteens" ARE the problem. These little girls are absolutely in danger of making him the next American Idol. Hopefully enough people are voting with some sense about them. I, myself, have never been a voter, merely an addicted observer, but with the current circumstances I may be forced to get more self invested.

Anonymous said...

Once Sanjaya is voted off, there's not much competition left. To me it is clear even this early on that Doolittle is going to win. Everyone else compared to Doolittle doesn't even come close.

Just for the sheer heck of it - how interesting it would be to see Sanjaya and Doolittle compete against one another for the title of American Idol. Voters loving Doolittle, competitng against those who "vote for the worst" -Sanjaya.

See - this is why politics only allow one vote at a time :). On AI you can vote as many times as you want with phone and text. When the rules are that laid back - this was bound to happen. Maybe AI will start changing the rules on the amount of times people can vote? Just a thought. But at any rate, we can't really blame people for "voting for the worst". They have the right.

Anonymous said...

I can't believe that AI is about sideshows and not singing. After finding out who got kicked off tonight, my household won't be watching the show until Sanjaya is given the boot. He knows for himself that he sucks, you can tell by his performaces.

Anonymous said...

For the exception of Melinda, Jordin and Lakisha, this year is no good. If Sanjaya ends up winning this year, I doubt I'll watch it next year. Is it just me, or what, but Idol just isn't the same without Taylor Hicks. He entertained, while commanding the stage, and drew you in.

Anonymous said...

I agree. Sanjaya is terrible. When he didn't get voted off last week I almost quit watching. Its all the younger people voting for him. I think Jordan should win, because not only is she very talented, she is outgoing and has a good attitude... I never vote but I am about to start..... Alot of good singers were voted off when the worst one is still on there. Sanjaya knows he isn't a good singer. You can tell by his comments and his reactions when he doesn't get voted off. That should tell people something there....If he wins I won't be watching next year!!!

Anonymous said...

Sanjays is in the GROUP WITH HUNG
THE BOY CAN NOT SING, I AM NOT WATCHING THE IDOL ANYMORE. THE SHOW IS NOT LIKE IT USE TO BE

Anonymous said...

I stopped watching Idol after most of its "winners" failed to release one decent song. No BS about ageism, size-ism, or all those -isms; I base my judgement off their real-world performance, plain and simple.

Thus, my hat is off to Kelly Clarkson and Carrie Underwood, who are actually excelling in their careers, and best of luck to Daughtry.